Apple M2 vs EPYC 7H12

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
45.02
+446%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Apple M2 by a whopping 446% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Apple M2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking37861
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.95no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple Apple M-Series
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)no data
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years ago)10 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$1750 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Apple M2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1288
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.48 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)20 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million20000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Apple M2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Apple M2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Apple M2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Apple M2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.02
+446%
Apple M2 8.24

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Apple M2 by 446% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+366%
Apple M2 14933

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Apple M2 by 366% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.02 8.24
Recency 18 September 2019 10 June 2022
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 20 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Apple M2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Apple M2
M2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 508 votes

Rate Apple M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Apple M2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.