EPYC 7H12 vs Apple M1 Pro

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
11.83
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.03
+281%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Apple M1 Pro by 281% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Apple M1 Pro and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking59439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data22.29
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M-SeriesAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameno dataZen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date18 October 2021 (2 years ago)18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$11.95 $1970

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Apple M1 Pro and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads10128
Base clock speed2.064 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache2.9 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache24 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistors33700 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Apple M1 Pro and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)no data280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Pro and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 Pro and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 Pro and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPUno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 Pro 11.83
EPYC 7H12 45.03
+281%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Apple M1 Pro by 281% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Apple M1 Pro 17149
EPYC 7H12 69633
+306%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Apple M1 Pro by 306% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 11.83 45.03
Recency 18 October 2021 18 September 2019
Physical cores 10 64
Threads 10 128
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 Pro in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 Pro is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 351 vote

Rate Apple M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M1 Pro or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.