EPYC 7532 vs EPYC 7702

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7702
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.18
+31.7%

EPYC 7702 outperforms EPYC 7532 by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7532 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3795
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.4315.94
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,450no data
Current price$8948 (1.4x MSRP)$2019

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7532 has 556% better value for money than EPYC 7702.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702 45.18
+31.7%
EPYC 7532 34.30

EPYC 7702 outperforms EPYC 7532 by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7702 69872
+31.7%
EPYC 7532 53051

EPYC 7702 outperforms EPYC 7532 by 32% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7702 1172
+3.7%
EPYC 7532 1130

EPYC 7702 outperforms EPYC 7532 by 4% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7702 11524
+24.7%
EPYC 7532 9243

EPYC 7702 outperforms EPYC 7532 by 25% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.18 34.30
Recency 7 August 2019 19 February 2020
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64

The EPYC 7702 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7532 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7532, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702
AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 18 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702 or EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.