Athlon X4 840 vs EPYC 7702

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7702
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
44.30
+2010%
Athlon X4 840
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.10

EPYC 7702 outperforms Athlon X4 840 by a whopping 2010% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7702 and Athlon X4 840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking451873
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.86no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYC4x Athlon
Power efficiency20.873.04
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,450no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702 and Athlon X4 840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1284
Base clock speed2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MB256K
L2 cache32 MB4 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2245 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702 and Athlon X4 840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Socket FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt65 watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and Athlon X4 840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and Athlon X4 840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and Athlon X4 840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7702 and Athlon X4 840.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702 44.30
+2010%
Athlon X4 840 2.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7702 70107
+2008%
Athlon X4 840 3325

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7702 1178
+164%
Athlon X4 840 447

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7702 11708
+952%
Athlon X4 840 1113

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.30 2.10
Recency 7 August 2019 on August 2014
Physical cores 64 4
Threads 128 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7702 has a 2009.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon X4 840, on the other hand, has 207.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7702 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 840 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7702 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon X4 840 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702 and Athlon X4 840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702
AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 29 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 618 votes

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702 or Athlon X4 840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.