Athlon X4 840 vs PRO A8-9600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

PRO A8-9600
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
2.17
+0.9%
Athlon X4 840
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
2.15

PRO A8-9600 outperforms Athlon X4 840 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17341744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data7.38
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno data4x Athlon
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date3 October 2016 (7 years old)August 2014 (9 years old)
Current priceno data$45

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data256K
L2 cache2048 KB4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4Socket FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A8-9600 2.17
+0.9%
Athlon X4 840 2.15

PRO A8-9600 outperforms Athlon X4 840 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

PRO A8-9600 3359
+1.2%
Athlon X4 840 3319

PRO A8-9600 outperforms Athlon X4 840 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.17 2.15
Recency 3 October 2016 on August 2014

We couldn't decide between PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A8-9600 and Athlon X4 840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A8-9600
PRO A8-9600
AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 15 votes

Rate PRO A8-9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 562 votes

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A8-9600 or Athlon X4 840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.