Xeon w7-2495X vs EPYC 7662

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads
46.98
+22.7%
Xeon w7-2495X
2023
24 cores / 48 threads
38.30

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon w7-2495X by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Xeon w7-2495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data20.96
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current priceno data$3196

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

EPYC 7662 and Xeon w7-2495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads12848
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache4 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache32 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB45 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data77 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Xeon w7-2495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket SP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon w7-2495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7662 and Xeon w7-2495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon w7-2495X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon w7-2495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB2 TB
Max memory channels84
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon w7-2495X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 46.98
+22.7%
Xeon w7-2495X 38.30

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon w7-2495X by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7662 72653
+22.7%
Xeon w7-2495X 59227

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon w7-2495X by 23% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 46.98 38.30
Recency 19 February 2020 1 January 2023
Physical cores 64 24
Threads 128 48

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon w7-2495X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Xeon w7-2495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
Intel Xeon w7-2495X
Xeon w7-2495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 8 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon w7-2495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Xeon w7-2495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.