Intel Xeon w9-3475X vs AMD EPYC 7662

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

EPYC 7662
47.74
+12.1%

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon w9-3475X by 12% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Xeon w9-3475X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3446
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data11.39
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years old)1 January 2023 (1 year old)
Current priceno data$3979
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

EPYC 7662 and Xeon w9-3475X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)36
Threads12872
Base clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache4 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache32 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB82.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Xeon w9-3475X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket SP3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon w9-3475X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7662 and Xeon w9-3475X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon w9-3475X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon w9-3475X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon w9-3475X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 47.74
+12.1%
Xeon w9-3475X 42.57

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon w9-3475X by 12% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7662 73321
+12.1%
Xeon w9-3475X 65379

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon w9-3475X by 12% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 47.74 42.57
Recency 19 February 2020 1 January 2023
Physical cores 64 36
Threads 128 72
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 300 Watt

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon w9-3475X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Xeon w9-3475X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
Xeon w9-3475X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 8 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Intel Xeon w9-3475X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Xeon w9-3475X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.