Xeon Platinum 8380 vs EPYC 7662

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads
46.97
+16.6%

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8380 by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Xeon Platinum 8380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3561
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.47
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current priceno data$11816

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7662 and Xeon Platinum 8380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)40 (Tetraconta-Core)
Threads12880
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache4 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache32 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data83 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Xeon Platinum 8380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketSocket SP3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon Platinum 8380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7662 and Xeon Platinum 8380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon Platinum 8380 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon Platinum 8380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Xeon Platinum 8380.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 46.97
+16.6%
Xeon Platinum 8380 40.29

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8380 by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7662 72653
+16.6%
Xeon Platinum 8380 62318

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8380 by 17% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.97 40.29
Recency 19 February 2020 6 April 2021
Physical cores 64 40
Threads 128 80
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 270 Watt

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Xeon Platinum 8380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
Xeon Platinum 8380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 8 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 82 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Xeon Platinum 8380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.