Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 vs AMD EPYC 7742

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Combined performance score

EPYC 7742
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.17
+11%
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021
40 cores / 80 threads
40.68

EPYC 7742 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8380 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking4057
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money19.451.41
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years old)6 April 2021 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,950no data
Current price$2294 (0.3x MSRP)$11858
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7742 has 1279% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8380.

Technical specs

EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)40 (Tetraconta-Core)
Threads12880
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data83 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8380 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8380.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7742 45.17
+11%
Xeon Platinum 8380 40.68

EPYC 7742 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8380 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7742 69183
+11%
Xeon Platinum 8380 62318

EPYC 7742 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8380 by 11% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 45.17 40.68
Recency 7 August 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 64 40
Threads 128 80
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 270 Watt

The EPYC 7742 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7742
EPYC 7742
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
Xeon Platinum 8380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 122 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7742 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 82 votes

Rate Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7742 or Xeon Platinum 8380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.