EPYC 7713 vs EPYC 7453

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7453
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 225 Watt
33.05
EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
54.12
+63.8%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7453 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7713 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.443.84
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency13.3921.93
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,570$7,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7453 has 328% better value for money than EPYC 7713.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads56128
Base clock speed2.75 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.45 GHz3.68 GHz
Multiplier27.520
L1 cache1792 KB4 MB
L2 cache14 MB32 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm+
Die size4x 81 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors16,600 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7713.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7453 33.05
EPYC 7713 54.12
+63.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7453 50575
EPYC 7713 82825
+63.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.05 54.12
Physical cores 28 64
Threads 56 128

EPYC 7713 has a 63.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 128.6% more physical cores and 128.6% more threads.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7453 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7453
EPYC 7453
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7453 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7453 or EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.