EPYC 7713 vs EPYC 75F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.13
EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
52.14
+20.9%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 75F3 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7713 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.314.08
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency14.5821.93
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,860$7,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 75F3 has 55% better value for money than EPYC 7713.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads64128
Base clock speed2.95 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.68 GHz
Multiplier29.520
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm+
Die size8x 81 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7713.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 75F3 43.13
EPYC 7713 52.14
+20.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 75F3 68505
EPYC 7713 82825
+20.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 75F3 1826
+15.6%
EPYC 7713 1579

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 75F3 16432
+7.4%
EPYC 7713 15297

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.13 52.14
Physical cores 32 64
Threads 64 128
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 7713 has a 20.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 24.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 75F3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 75F3 and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 75F3 or EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.