EPYC 7513 vs EPYC 7453

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7453
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 225 Watt
31.84
EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
37.32
+17.2%

EPYC 7513 outperforms EPYC 7453 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12883
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.2311.24
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency13.3917.66
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,570$2,840

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7453 has 53% better value for money than EPYC 7513.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads5664
Base clock speed2.75 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.45 GHz3.65 GHz
Multiplier27.526
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+7 nm+
Die size4x 81 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors16,600 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7513.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7453 31.84
EPYC 7513 37.32
+17.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7453 50575
EPYC 7513 59285
+17.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.84 37.32
Physical cores 28 32
Threads 56 64
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC 7513 has a 17.2% higher aggregate performance score, 14.3% more physical cores and 14.3% more threads, and 12.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7453 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7453 and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7453
EPYC 7453
AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7453 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7453 or EPYC 7513, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.