Apple M1 Pro vs EPYC 7402

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7402
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
29.52
+168%
Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads, 2064 Watt
11.03

EPYC 7402 outperforms Apple M1 Pro by a whopping 168% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7402 and Apple M1 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking155711
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.16no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M-Series
Power efficiency15.23no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,783no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7402 and Apple M1 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads4810
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.22 GHz
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache1.5 MB2.9 MB
L2 cache12 MB28 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7402 and Apple M1 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt2064 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7402 and Apple M1 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7402 and Apple M1 Pro are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7402 and Apple M1 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7402 29.52
+168%
Apple M1 Pro 11.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7402 46012
+168%
Apple M1 Pro 17192

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.52 11.03
Recency 7 August 2019 18 October 2021
Physical cores 24 10
Threads 48 10
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 2064 Watt

EPYC 7402 has a 167.6% higher aggregate performance score, 140% more physical cores and 380% more threads, and 1046.7% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7402 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 Pro in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7402 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7402 and Apple M1 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7402
EPYC 7402
Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7402 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 403 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7402 or Apple M1 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.