Core i7-14700KF vs EPYC 7282
Aggregate performance score
i7-14700KF outperforms EPYC 7282 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7282 and Core i7-14700KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 274 | 96 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 64.18 | 98.67 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (4 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $650 | no data |
| Current price | $188 (0.3x MSRP) | $374 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-14700KF has 54% better value for money than EPYC 7282.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7282 and Core i7-14700KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 33 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7282 and Core i7-14700KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7282 and Core i7-14700KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
EPYC 7282 and Core i7-14700KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7282 and Core i7-14700KF are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7282 and Core i7-14700KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7282 and Core i7-14700KF.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-14700KF outperforms EPYC 7282 by 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-14700KF outperforms EPYC 7282 by 78% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-14700KF outperforms EPYC 7282 by 160% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-14700KF outperforms EPYC 7282 by 131% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.39 | 34.53 |
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 1 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 20 |
| Threads | 32 | 28 |
The Core i7-14700KF is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7282 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7282 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-14700KF is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7282 and Core i7-14700KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
