Xeon Gold 5420+ vs EPYC 7343

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7343
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
28.57
Xeon Gold 5420+
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
37.24
+30.3%

Xeon Gold 5420+ outperforms EPYC 7343 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 5420+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15080
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.92no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Sapphire Rapids
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,565no data
Current price$1118 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 5420+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads3256
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)52.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 5420+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP34677
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 5420+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSXno data+

Security technologies

EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 5420+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 5420+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 5420+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 5420+.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7343 28.57
Xeon Gold 5420+ 37.24
+30.3%

Xeon Gold 5420+ outperforms EPYC 7343 by 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7343 44189
Xeon Gold 5420+ 57593
+30.3%

Xeon Gold 5420+ outperforms EPYC 7343 by 30% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.57 37.24
Recency 15 March 2021 10 January 2023
Physical cores 16 28
Threads 32 56
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon Gold 5420+ is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7343 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7343 and Xeon Gold 5420+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343
Intel Xeon Gold 5420+
Xeon Gold 5420+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7343 or Xeon Gold 5420+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.