Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs EPYC 72F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
17.62
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.21
+3.3%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms EPYC 72F3 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking329307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.15no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,468no data
Current price$4484 (1.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 72F3 17.62
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 18.21
+3.3%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms EPYC 72F3 by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 72F3 27252
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28170
+3.4%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms EPYC 72F3 by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.62 18.21
Recency 15 March 2021 13 June 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Be aware that EPYC 72F3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 37 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 72F3 or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.