A4-3400 vs E-450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E-450 and A4-3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2610
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.85
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date22 August 2011 (12 years ago)7 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$125 $27

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E-450 and A4-3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm32 nm
Die size75 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E-450 and A4-3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFM1
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-450 and A4-3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-450 and A4-3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-450 and A4-3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6320Radeon HD 6410D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E-450 765
A4-3400 1081
+41.3%

A4-3400 outperforms E-450 by 41% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-450 109
A4-3400 294
+170%

A4-3400 outperforms E-450 by 170% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-450 176
A4-3400 513
+191%

A4-3400 outperforms E-450 by 191% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between E-450 and A4-3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E-450 is a notebook processor while A4-3400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-450 and A4-3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-450
E-450
AMD A4-3400
A4-3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 465 votes

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 75 votes

Rate A4-3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-450 or A4-3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.