Core i9-10980XE vs E-350
Primary details
Comparing E-350 and Core i9-10980XE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 232 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 15.96 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Cascade Lake-X (2019) |
Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 19 October 2019 (4 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $979 |
Current price | $268 | $891 (0.9x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
E-350 and Core i9-10980XE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 36 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 24.75 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 86 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on E-350 and Core i9-10980XE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FT1 | FCLGA2066 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Core i9-10980XE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | DDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | no data | + |
AVX | no data | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
E-350 and Core i9-10980XE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Core i9-10980XE are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Core i9-10980XE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 94 GB/s |
ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Core i9-10980XE.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 7695% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 1412% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 6561% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 648% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 2867% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 1284% in 3DMark06 CPU.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
E-350 outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 2348% in wPrime 32.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 6193% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 January 2011 | 19 October 2019 |
Physical cores | 2 | 18 |
Threads | 2 | 36 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 165 Watt |
We couldn't decide between E-350 and Core i9-10980XE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while Core i9-10980XE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Core i9-10980XE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.