Core i9-10980XE vs E-350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and Core i9-10980XE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.96
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Cascade Lake-X (2019)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)19 October 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$979
Current price$268 $891 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E-350 and Core i9-10980XE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads236
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C86 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and Core i9-10980XE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Core i9-10980XE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

E-350 and Core i9-10980XE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Core i9-10980XE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Core i9-10980XE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data94 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Core i9-10980XE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E-350 421
i9-10980XE 32818
+7695%

Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 7695% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-350 104
i9-10980XE 1572
+1412%

Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 1412% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E-350 181
i9-10980XE 12057
+6561%

Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 6561% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E-350 1049
i9-10980XE 7847
+648%

Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 648% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E-350 2005
i9-10980XE 59479
+2867%

Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 2867% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E-350 1021
i9-10980XE 14129
+1284%

Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 1284% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

E-350 68.8
i9-10980XE 2.81
+2348%

E-350 outperforms Core i9-10980XE by 2348% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E-350 1
i9-10980XE 38
+6193%

Core i9-10980XE outperforms E-350 by 6193% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 19 October 2019
Physical cores 2 18
Threads 2 36
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 165 Watt

We couldn't decide between E-350 and Core i9-10980XE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while Core i9-10980XE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Core i9-10980XE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
Intel Core i9-10980XE
Core i9-10980XE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 375 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 541 vote

Rate Core i9-10980XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or Core i9-10980XE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.