E-350 vs Core i9-10900X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-10900X and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking448not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.39no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-X (2019)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date19 October 2019 (4 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$537 $268

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-10900X and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads202
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
Maximum core temperature94 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-10900X and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066FT1
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900X and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512DDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i9-10900X and E-350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900X and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900X and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth94 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900X and E-350.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-10900X 22513
+5248%
E-350 421

Core i9-10900X outperforms E-350 by 5248% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-10900X 1577
+1416%
E-350 104

Core i9-10900X outperforms E-350 by 1416% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-10900X 9366
+5075%
E-350 181

Core i9-10900X outperforms E-350 by 5075% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2019 4 January 2011
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 18 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i9-10900X and E-350. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i9-10900X is a desktop processor while E-350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900X and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-10900X
Core i9-10900X
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 988 votes

Rate Core i9-10900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 356 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-10900X or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.