Celeron 540 vs E-450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E-450
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.48
+153%

E-450 outperforms Celeron 540 by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-450 and Celeron 540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29103246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.520.60
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)no data
Release date22 August 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-450 and Celeron 540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speedno data1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography40 nm65 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on E-450 and Celeron 540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-450 and Celeron 540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

E-450 and Celeron 540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-450 and Celeron 540 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-450 and Celeron 540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6320no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-450 0.48
+153%
Celeron 540 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-450 765
+151%
Celeron 540 305

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-450 109
Celeron 540 180
+65.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-450 178
Celeron 540 178

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 0.19
Recency 22 August 2011 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 30 Watt

E-450 has a 152.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The E-450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-450 and Celeron 540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-450
E-450
Intel Celeron 540
Celeron 540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 541 vote

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 16 votes

Rate Celeron 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-450 or Celeron 540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.