Intel Core i7-8705G vs Core i5-9300H
Comparing Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Information on Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H technologies aimed at raising security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H.
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs.
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H.
Various benchmark results of Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode a sample Full HD (1080p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of source video file were encoded per second.
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario.
Let's see how good Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8705G
More powerful video core
Higher base clock speed (3100 vs 2400 MHz)
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9300H
0.4% better performance in benchmarks
Much newer (30 April 2019 vs 1 February 2018)
Cheaper ($861 vs $1384)
Lower power consumption (45 vs 65 watts)
HyperThreading (allows one physical CPU function as two logical ones. It increases performance, since while one logical CPU is waiting for data, the second may still do useful work)
So, Core i7-8705G or Core i5-9300H?
Technical City couldn't decide between Intel Core i7-8705G and Intel Core i5-9300H. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8705G and Core i5-9300H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.