Celeron G1101 vs i7-640M

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-640M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.31
+89.9%
Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.69

Core i7-640M outperforms Celeron G1101 by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-640M and Celeron G1101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22632717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.97
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency3.530.89
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date13 September 2010 (14 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-640M and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz0.27 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 Million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-640M and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA988FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-640M and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
vPro+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-640M and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-640M and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-640M and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16.38 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-640M and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-640M and Celeron G1101.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes161

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-640M 1.31
+89.9%
Celeron G1101 0.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-640M 2070
+90.6%
Celeron G1101 1086

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 0.69
Recency 13 September 2010 7 January 2010
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 73 Watt

i7-640M has a 89.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more threads, and 108.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-640M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1101 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-640M is a notebook processor while Celeron G1101 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-640M and Celeron G1101, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-640M
Core i7-640M
Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 521 vote

Rate Core i7-640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-640M or Celeron G1101, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.