Celeron G1101 vs i3-350M

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3062	3065
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	0.97
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Core i3	no data
Power efficiency	0.75	0.36
Designer	Intel	Intel
Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date	7 January 2010 (16 years ago)	7 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$130	$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1101 has 2325% better value for money than i3-350M.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i3-350M and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2.26 GHz	2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed	0.27 GHz	0.27 GHz
Bus type	DMI 1.0	no data
Bus rate	1 × 2.5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	17	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	3 MB (shared)	2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	32 nm
Die size	81+114 mm2	81 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA	no data
Number of transistors	382+177 Million	382 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-350M and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	BGA1288,PGA988	FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
FMA	+	-
vPro	no data	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
PAE	36 Bit	36 Bit
FDI	+	+
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i3-350M and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	-
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	8 GB	16.38 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	17.051 GB/s	17 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors	Intel HD
Clear Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	667 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-350M and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-350M and Celeron G1101.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	16	1

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Threads	4	2
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	73 Watt