A4-3400 vs Celeron G1101

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads
0.69

Primary Details

Comparing Celeron G1101 and A4-3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25742579
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.975.85
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)7 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85no data
Current price$40 (0.5x MSRP)$27

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A4-3400 has 503% better value for money than Celeron G1101.

Detailed Specifications

Celeron G1101 and A4-3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors382 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1101 and A4-3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156FM1
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and A4-3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Celeron G1101 and A4-3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and A4-3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and A4-3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDRadeon HD 6410D

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and A4-3400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and A4-3400.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1101 0.69
A4-3400 0.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron G1101 1086
+0.5%
A4-3400 1081

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 7 January 2010 7 September 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 65 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron G1101 and A4-3400.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and A4-3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101
AMD A4-3400
A4-3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 75 votes

Rate A4-3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1101 or A4-3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.