Xeon L3110 vs i5-9400F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9400F
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
6.14
+606%

i5-9400F outperforms Xeon L3110 by a whopping 606% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400F and Xeon L3110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10732533
Place by popularity38not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)no data
Release date8 January 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400F and Xeon L3110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)no data
Threads6no data
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHzno data
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache9 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C79 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400F and Xeon L3110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon L3110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i5-9400F and Xeon L3110 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon L3110 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon L3110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400F and Xeon L3110.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9400F 6.14
+606%
Xeon L3110 0.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-9400F 9466
+607%
Xeon L3110 1338

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.14 0.87
Recency 8 January 2019 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

i5-9400F has a 605.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon L3110, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-9400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L3110 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-9400F is a desktop processor while Xeon L3110 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400F and Xeon L3110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400F
Core i5-9400F
Intel Xeon L3110
Xeon L3110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 56426 votes

Rate Core i5-9400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L3110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400F or Xeon L3110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.