Turion X2 RM-74 vs i3-4130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4130
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 54 Watt
2.09
+354%
Turion X2 RM-74
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46

Core i3-4130 outperforms Turion X2 RM-74 by a whopping 354% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18922943
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.45no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Turion
Power efficiency3.661.24
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150S1
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4400no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74.

PCIe versionUp to 3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 0.46
Recency 1 September 2013 1 January 2009
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 35 Watt

i3-4130 has a 354.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

Turion X2 RM-74, on the other hand, has 54.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-4130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-74 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-4130 is a desktop processor while Turion X2 RM-74 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4130 and Turion X2 RM-74, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4130
Core i3-4130
AMD Turion X2 RM-74
Turion X2 RM-74

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1023 votes

Rate Core i3-4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 31 vote

Rate Turion X2 RM-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4130 or Turion X2 RM-74, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.