Intel HD Graphics 4400: specs and benchmarks

VS
Price now 425$
Games supported 56%
Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 1.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 200
  • Max video memory System Shared
  • Memory type System Shared
  • Memory clock speed System Shared
  • Maximum resolution
Year of release 2013
Performance 1.78

Summary

Intel started HD Graphics 4400 sales 5 June 2013. This is Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture notebook card based on 22 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 1.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 20 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at

1.78%

of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.

General info

Of HD Graphics 4400's architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating884
Place by popularity83
Value for money0.05
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptop
Release date5 June 2013 (9 years ago)
Current price$425 of 49999 (A100 SXM4)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

HD Graphics 4400's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of HD Graphics 4400's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20of 18432 (AD102)
Core clock speed200 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed1100 MHzof 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600)
Number of transistors392 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology22 nmof 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti)
Thermal design power (TDP)20 Wattof 900 (Tesla S2050)
Texture fill rate22.00of 939.8 (H100 SXM5)
Floating-point performance46 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on HD Graphics 4400's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on HD Graphics 4400: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedof 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width64/128 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedof 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)
Shared memory+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on HD Graphics 4400. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by HD Graphics 4400. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+

API support

APIs supported by HD Graphics 4400, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.3of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile)
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan1.1.80

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance of HD Graphics 4400. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 4400 1.78
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
  • Unigine Heaven 3.0
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

HD Graphics 4400 522

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 4400 736

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 4400 3583

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 4400 4953

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 4400 525

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 4400 569

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

HD Graphics 4400 37082

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

HD Graphics 4400 8

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

HD Graphics 4400 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 9

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 2

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 2

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 8

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 4

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 7

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 0.1

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 4

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 8

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 9

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 2

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 7

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 2

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

HD Graphics 4400 0.1

Game benchmarks

Let's see how good HD Graphics 4400 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

900p12
Full HD10

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Battlefield 5 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 2−3
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
Hitman 3 2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Battlefield 5 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 2−3
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
Hitman 3 2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
Metro Exodus 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Battlefield 5 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 2−3
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Hitman 3 2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
Metro Exodus 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Battlefield 5 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 2−3
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Hitman 3 2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
Metro Exodus 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Battlefield 5 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 2−3
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3

Relative perfomance

Overall HD Graphics 4400 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

AMD Radeon HD 8670M Radeon HD 8670M
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri) Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 M255 Radeon R5 M255
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M GeForce GT 425M
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce 820M GeForce 820M
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with HD Graphics 4400 according to our statistics.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.2 538 ratings

Rate Intel HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about HD Graphics 4400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.