Ryzen Threadripper 1950 vs Ultra 7 251HX
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 7 251HX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950 by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 244 | 751 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Arrow Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.95 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-HX (2025−2026) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 April 2026 (less than a year ago) | 29 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core Ultra 7 251HX and Ryzen Threadripper 1950: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 18 (Octadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 18 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 30 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 251HX and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 251HX and Ryzen Threadripper 1950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 251HX and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 251HX and Ryzen Threadripper 1950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Quad-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (300 - 1800 MHz) | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 28.50 | 12.92 |
| Recency | 1 April 2026 | 29 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 18 | 16 |
| Threads | 18 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
Ultra 7 251HX has a 121% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 13% more physical cores, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950, on the other hand, has 78% more threads.
The Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core Ultra 7 251HX is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
