Atom N270 vs Core 2 Solo SU3500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Solo SU3500
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.17
+88.9%
Atom N270
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.09

Core 2 Solo SU3500 outperforms Atom N270 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32843396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.933.41
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262$44

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache64 KB56 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15V0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA956PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 0.17
+88.9%
Atom N270 0.09

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 1468
+171%
Atom N270 541

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 654
+35.3%
Atom N270 483

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 112.25
+12.2%
Atom N270 126

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.09
Recency 1 April 2009 2 April 2008
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 2 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3500 has a 88.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Solo SU3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500
Core 2 Solo SU3500
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 252 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3500 or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.