Atom Z3740 vs Athlon 64 TF-20

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 TF-20
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16
Atom Z3740
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.39
+144%

Atom Z3740 outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Atom Z3740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33003021
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency0.6118.45
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$32

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Atom Z3740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache0.1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Atom Z3740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g1UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Atom Z3740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protectionno data
AES-NI-+
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Atom Z3740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Atom Z3740 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Atom Z3740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 TF-20 0.16
Atom Z3740 0.39
+144%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon 64 TF-20 1245
+29.3%
Atom Z3740 963

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 TF-20 612
Atom Z3740 1838
+200%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 0.39
Recency 1 May 2009 27 September 2013
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 2 Watt

Atom Z3740 has a 143.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The Atom Z3740 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Atom Z3740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
Intel Atom Z3740
Atom Z3740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 41 vote

Rate Atom Z3740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 TF-20 or Atom Z3740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.