Pentium 4 1.80 vs Core 2 Duo E6700
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo E6700 outperforms Pentium 4 1.80 by a whopping 786% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium 4 1.80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2818 | 3430 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core 2 Duo (Desktop) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.91 | 0.10 |
| Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | Willamette (2000−2001) |
| Release date | no data | August 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium 4 1.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 217 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 78 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 million | 42 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium 4 1.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 775 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 67 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium 4 1.80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium 4 1.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.62 | 0.07 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 67 Watt |
Core 2 Duo E6700 has a 785.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 176.9% more advanced lithography process, and 3.1% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo E6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 1.80 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Pentium 4 1.80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
