Celeron T3000: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T3000
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43

Celeron T3000 provides poor benchmark performance at 0.43% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

Intel started Celeron T3000 sales 1 April 2009. This is notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems.

Compatibility-wise, this is PGA478 processor with a TDP of 35 Watt.

Primary details

Celeron T3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking2952
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
Power efficiency1.16of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Base clock speed1.8 GHzof 4.7 GHz (FX-9590)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheof 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X)
Chip lithography45 nmof 3 nm (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
Maximum core temperature105 °Cof 110 °C (Atom x7-E3950)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-
VID voltage range1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3000 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattof 3100 ‑ 4500 (Ryzen 7 7435H)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-
Turbo Boost Technology-
Hyper-Threading Technology-
Demand Based Switching-

Security technologies

Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-
EDB+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

VT-x-

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Celeron T3000. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T3000 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T3000 687

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron T3000 225

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron T3000 384

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Celeron T3000's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook CPUs.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Celeron T3000 is Turion 64 X2 TL-62, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 13 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Celeron T3000:

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Celeron T3000, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Celeron T3000 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 27 configurations using Celeron T3000 in our database.

RX 580 Radeon RX 580
3.7% (1/27)
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
3.7% (1/27)
Graphics Radeon Graphics
3.7% (1/27)
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
14.8% (4/27)
HD 7470M Radeon HD 7470M
3.7% (1/27)
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
3.7% (1/27)
GT 230 GeForce GT 230
3.7% (1/27)
HD Graphics HD Graphics
7.4% (2/27)
GT 330M GeForce GT 330M
3.7% (1/27)
8200M G GeForce 8200M G
11.1% (3/27)

All comparisons with Celeron T3000

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Celeron T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.