Celeron T3000 vs Athlon II P340
Primary Details
Comparing Athlon II P340 and Celeron T3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Athlon II | no data |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | no data |
Release date | 4 October 2010 (13 years ago) | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) |
Current price | $169 | no data |
Detailed Specifications
Athlon II P340 and Celeron T3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
Bus support | 3200 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
VID voltage range | no data | 1V-1.25V |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II P340 and Celeron T3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | S1g4 | PGA478 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P340 and Celeron T3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | SSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVM | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Athlon II P340 and Celeron T3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II P340 and Celeron T3000 are enumerated here.
VT-x | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Athlon II P340 outperforms Celeron T3000 by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron T3000 outperforms Athlon II P340 by 18% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron T3000 outperforms Athlon II P340 by 21% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & Cons Summary
Recency | 4 October 2010 | 1 April 2009 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Athlon II P340 and Celeron T3000. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II P340 and Celeron T3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.