Geode LX 800 vs Celeron N2820

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronGeode LX
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Castle
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$215 (2x MSRP)$300

Technical specs

Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.13 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.39 GHz0.5 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt3.6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency756 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron N2820 1061
+689%
Geode LX 800 135

Celeron N2820 outperforms Geode LX 800 by 689% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Advantages and disadvantages


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 3 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2820 and Geode LX 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2820
Celeron N2820
AMD Geode LX 800
Geode LX 800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 34 votes

Rate Celeron N2820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Geode LX 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2820 or Geode LX 800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.