Celeron 220 vs M P4500
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M P4500 outperforms Celeron 220 by a whopping 369% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Celeron 220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2842 | 3391 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.66 | 0.65 |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 April 2010 (14 years ago) | October 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4500 and Celeron 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 77 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 105 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1V-1.3375V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4500 and Celeron 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA988 | PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 19 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and Celeron 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M P4500 and Celeron 220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4500 and Celeron 220 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.61 | 0.13 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 19 Watt |
Celeron M P4500 has a 369.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 220, on the other hand, has 84.2% lower power consumption.
The Celeron M P4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 220 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
