Atom Z670 vs Celeron M P4600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2822not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.51no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Lincroft (2010−2011)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)11 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$75

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno datacDMI
Bus rate2500 MHz400 MT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cache128 KB56 KB
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81+114 mm265 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA988T-PBGA518
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data2.93 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataPowerVR SGX535

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670 integrated GPUs.

LVDSno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670.

PCI supportno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M P4600 1886
+279%
Atom Z670 497

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron M P4600 4213
+455%
Atom Z670 759

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M P4600 34.29
+340%
Atom Z670 151

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron M P4600 1
+477%
Atom Z670 0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2010 11 April 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 3 Watt

Celeron M P4600 has 100% more physical cores, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z670, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600
Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4600 or Atom Z670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.