Athlon 900 vs Celeron M P4500
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Athlon 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2745 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Thunderbird (1999−2000) |
| Release date | 1 April 2010 (14 years ago) | 6 March 2000 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4500 and Athlon 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 102 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 22 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4500 and Athlon 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA988 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 60 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4500 and Athlon 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2010 | 6 March 2000 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 60 Watt |
Celeron M P4500 has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 462.5% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M P4500 and Athlon 900. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M P4500 is a notebook processor while Athlon 900 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Athlon 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
