Mobile Pentium III 500 vs Celeron M 900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 900 and Mobile Pentium III 500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3401not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency0.22no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Coppermine (1999−2001)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)25 October 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$530

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 900 and Mobile Pentium III 500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz0.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
Chip lithography45 nm180 nm
Die size107 mm2106 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million28 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 and Mobile Pentium III 500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478495
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Mobile Pentium III 500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2009 25 October 1999
Chip lithography 45 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron M 900 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Pentium III 500, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 900 and Mobile Pentium III 500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Mobile Pentium III 500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 900
Celeron M 900
Intel Mobile Pentium III 500
Mobile Pentium III 500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 21 vote

Rate Celeron M 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Mobile Pentium III 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 900 or Mobile Pentium III 500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.