Mobile Pentium III 500 vs Celeron M 630 MHz
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | no data |
Designer | Intel | Intel |
Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
Architecture codename | no data | Coppermine (1999−2001) |
Release date | no data | 25 October 1999 (25 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $530 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 630 MHz and Mobile Pentium III 500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 0.63 GHz | 0.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 32 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 256 KB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 180 nm |
Die size | no data | 106 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 28 million |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 630 MHz and Mobile Pentium III 500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | 495 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 17 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 17 Watt |
Celeron M 630 MHz has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 240% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 630 MHz and Intel Mobile Pentium III 500. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.