Core i5-11400F vs Core 2 Extreme X7800
Aggregate performance score
i5-11400F outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7800 by a whopping 1391% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Core i5-11400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2582 | 659 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 32 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 70.40 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Extreme | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom XE (2007) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
| Release date | 17 July 2007 (16 years ago) | 16 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $851 | $157 |
| Current price | $299 (0.4x MSRP) | $107 (0.7x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Core i5-11400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB L2 Cache | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 276 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.375V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Core i5-11400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Core i5-11400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| SIPP | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Core i5-11400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Core i5-11400F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Core i5-11400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 50 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Core i5-11400F.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-11400F outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7800 by 1391% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-11400F outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7800 by 1399% in Passmark.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i5-11400F outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7800 by 543% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.74 | 11.03 |
| Recency | 17 July 2007 | 16 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Cost | $851 | $157 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 65 Watt |
The Core i5-11400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X7800 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Extreme X7800 is a notebook processor while Core i5-11400F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Core i5-11400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
