Mobile Sempron 3300+ vs Celeron M 743
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Sempron 3300+ outperforms Celeron M 743 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 743 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3322 | 3259 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 1.43 | 0.28 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Roma (2005) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 June 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 743 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 128 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 743 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA965 | 745 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 62/25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and Mobile Sempron 3300+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 1 June 2005 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 62 Watt |
Celeron M 743 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 520% lower power consumption.
Mobile Sempron 3300+, on the other hand, has a 20% higher aggregate performance score.
The Mobile Sempron 3300+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 743 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 743 and Mobile Sempron 3300+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
