Turion 64 ML-30 vs Celeron M 743
Aggregate performance score
Turion 64 ML-30 outperforms Celeron M 743 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3601 | 3566 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Turion 64 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (16 years ago) | March 2005 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 743 and Turion 64 ML-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 743 and Turion 64 ML-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA965 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and Turion 64 ML-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Celeron M 743 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 ML-30, on the other hand, has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Celeron M 743 and AMD Turion 64 ML-30.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
