Phenom II X2 N640 vs Celeron M 585

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 585
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.43
Phenom II X2 N640
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.91
+112%

Phenom II X2 N640 outperforms Celeron M 585 by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 585 and Phenom II X2 N640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29772545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron M2x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency1.312.46
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 585 and Phenom II X2 N640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 585 and Phenom II X2 N640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 585 and Phenom II X2 N640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHyperTransport 3.0, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Vurtualization
VirusProtect-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 585 and Phenom II X2 N640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 0.91
Recency 20 August 2008 1 October 2010
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 585 has 12.9% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X2 N640, on the other hand, has a 111.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Phenom II X2 N640 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 585 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 585 and Phenom II X2 N640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 585
Celeron M 585
AMD Phenom II X2 N640
Phenom II X2 N640

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M 585 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 18 votes

Rate Phenom II X2 N640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 585 or Phenom II X2 N640, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.