Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Celeron M 575
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 575 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3170 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 0.77 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 4 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 575 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 575 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XDNA 2 NPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2008 | 4 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron M 575 has 77.4% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 575 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
