Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Celeron M 530

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 530 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3249not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency0.60no data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
Release dateno data4 June 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 530 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed1.73 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache36 MB
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 530 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPBGA479,PPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 530 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXDNA 2 NPU
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 530 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 530 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 55 Watt

Celeron M 530 has 83.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 530 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 530 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 170
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 8 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 530 or Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.