Ryzen 5 7640U vs Celeron M 575
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms Celeron M 575 by a whopping 5232% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3150 | 555 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.76 | 84.10 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 3 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 7640U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 7640U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 13.33 |
| Recency | 1 June 2008 | 3 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7640U has a 5232% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 7640U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 575 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Ryzen 5 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
