Pentium E5500 vs Celeron M 575
Aggregate performance score
Pentium E5500 outperforms Celeron M 575 by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 575 and Pentium E5500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3166 | 2763 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.04 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.76 | 0.95 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 18 April 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $109 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 575 and Pentium E5500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 228 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 575 and Pentium E5500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and Pentium E5500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M 575 and Pentium E5500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 575 and Pentium E5500 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 575 and Pentium E5500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 575 and Pentium E5500.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 0.65 |
| Recency | 1 June 2008 | 18 April 2010 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron M 575 has 109.7% lower power consumption.
Pentium E5500, on the other hand, has a 160% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Pentium E5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 575 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 575 is a notebook processor while Pentium E5500 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Pentium E5500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
