Pentium D 915 vs Celeron M 560
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M 560 outperforms Pentium D 915 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 560 and Pentium D 915 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3079 | 3127 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.07 | 0.29 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Presler (2005−2007) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 23 July 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $74 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 560 and Pentium D 915 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 16 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 2x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 63 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 376 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.2V-1.3375V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 560 and Pentium D 915 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | LGA775,PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium D 915. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M 560 and Pentium D 915 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium D 915 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 560 and Pentium D 915. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.34 | 0.29 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 23 July 2006 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron M 560 has a 17.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 216.7% lower power consumption.
Pentium D 915, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The Celeron M 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium D 915 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 560 is a notebook processor while Pentium D 915 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Pentium D 915, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
