Atom N450 vs Turion 64 MK-36

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 MK-36
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.21
+61.5%
Atom N450
2009
1 core / 2 threads, 5 Watt
0.13

Turion 64 MK-36 outperforms Atom N450 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 MK-36 and Atom N450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32183350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Atom
Power efficiency0.642.05
Architecture codenameRichmondPinetrail (2009−2011)
Release dateno data21 December 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 MK-36 and Atom N450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L1 cacheno data56 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 MK-36 and Atom N450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and Atom N450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 MK-36 and Atom N450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and Atom N450 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and Atom N450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 MK-36 0.21
+61.5%
Atom N450 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion 64 MK-36 334
+64.5%
Atom N450 203

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion 64 MK-36 87
+34.5%
Atom N450 117

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.13
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 5 Watt

Turion 64 MK-36 has a 61.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom N450, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 520% lower power consumption.

The Turion 64 MK-36 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 MK-36 and Atom N450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 MK-36
Turion 64 MK-36
Intel Atom N450
Atom N450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 MK-36 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 182 votes

Rate Atom N450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 MK-36 or Atom N450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.