Turion 64 X2 TL-52 vs Celeron M 560
Aggregate performance score
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 560 and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3133 | 3134 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 1.04 | 1.01 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Trinidad (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 17 May 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 560 and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 560 and Turion 64 X2 TL-52 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 31 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 17 May 2006 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 31 Watt |
Celeron M 560 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 3.3% lower power consumption.
Turion 64 X2 TL-52, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron M 560 and Turion 64 X2 TL-52.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
